|
Typical of the media in today's time and
place, there is an out roar of indignation
surrounding President Bush's handling of
the Katrina disaster. He set idly by on
vacation while the Gulf coast areas of
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama were
being devastated. There is no question the
disaster was real or that assistance was
desperately needed. Why was there not a
quicker response?
Well, for one thing, the President is
prohibited, by law, from taking any
action, that's right prohibited, by
law, from taking ANY action, until a
request is made from the governor of the
state for such assistance. There is a good
reason for this law. When the governor
makes such a request they are then
required, by law, to turn over all
jurisdiction and state resources to the
federal representatives. Most governors,
and in particular, Democrat governors, are
reluctant to do this for fear of appearing
inadequate and unprepared themselves. You
didn't hear that on the evening news did
you?
Another thing that is incomprehensible to
me is that this was the worst disaster in
our nation's history, and yet within a
matter of twenty-four hours from the time
the President received the required
request for assistance, help was being
delivered. The governor of Louisiana did
not make that request until late Tuesday,
by Wednesday night the Army and National
Guard troops began arriving. I would think
that President Bush would be praised for a
speedy and well thought out plan of
evacuation and assistance, he has
implemented protocols and procedures never
before undertaken in this country. The
only event even that remotely comes close
to what has taken place here occurred
after world war ll when the Marshall Plan
was implemented.
Finally, I find it unconscionable that
anyone in the news media or anywhere else
would even hint at the possibility that
help was not provided because the people
in need were poor and black. Shame on any
of you who harbored such a thought. |